AuthorPeter Oakes is an experienced anti-financial crime, fintech and board director professional. Archives
December 2024
Categories
All
|
Back to Blog
"Decision makers seem hostile to a consideration of evidence or research". This post relates to the Reserve Bank of Australia board, which has been lashed by a former researcher for failing to understand monetary policy in an email made public. Many of the points raised could be levied at other central banks too. As central banks continue to claim immunity from scrutiny under a misguided cloak of a widely misunderstood principle of 'central bank independence', which applies to some but not each and every aspect of a central bank's remit, we should expect to see more criticism of them particularly:
On the 2nd last point, it is welcome reading that in the case of the Australian central bank the damning email was released by the bank following a freedom of information request. This is not something one could expect from many European central banks. The email also criticised the central bank for:
Here's a link to the Australia article on Reserve Bank Here's the link to Stefan Gerlach's (former Central Bank of Ireland deputy governor) post on his 'lonesome battle against the incantations' Both are worth a read. And when you do, think about any relevance to your central bank and although there is always two sides to every story, in the absence of comment by the Australian central bank, the reports of Dr Peter Tulip's comments make for compelling reading and thinking. This article is reference in my post on Linkedin.
1 Comment
Read More
17/10/2022 15:54:13
This is an Excellent & great post. I LOVE this article! It’s such a beneficial for all visitors. Contact us on WHATSAPP for quick response. You can also start a LIVE CHAT session to place an order without any hassle. We recommend you to contact us even after placing the order using our forms.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |